From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [DEV] Bump Emacs requirement to 24.4? Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:03:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87h9nzjeku.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbctieu3.fsf@gmx.us> <20150806074217.00177cc9@zotac> <87lhdohmii.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnekrfgi.fsf@gmx.us> <874mk15862.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp2povpl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y4hddl2y.fsf@free.fr> <87a8tsq4d9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zj1sk4uf.fsf@free.fr> <871tf4pbzr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u9cjfjn.fsf@free.fr> <87twrzkbow.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87si7jirbv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZR2Ha-0004qv-Dw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:03:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZR2HX-0005xJ-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:03:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZR2HX-0005x4-0U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:03:43 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZR2HU-0004Fg-3H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:03:40 +0200 Received: from p4ff1cd16.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.241.205.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:03:40 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by p4ff1cd16.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:03:40 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien Guerry writes: > The redefinition already happened (i.e. the master branch is about > Org+Emacs 24.3+) and it happened before we could reach a consensus > about it, or simply take the time to really discuss it as we need. > > I'm trying to find the best conditions to move forward here. Well, I'm not sure about achieving optimum, but I suggest that reverting those commits isn't going to help anybody. > If the repository is in a state that pushes us toward one decision, > these are not the best conditions IMO. > > So if we revert the changes, that's fine. If not, that's fine too, > but we will have to decide things as if the commits where not done. The decision for the current master branch was de-facto already taken. There was certainly a bit of a miscommunication, but Nicolas did those commits in good faith. Nothing is lost so far since maint is still Emacs 23 compatible. As long as it is kept that way, you still have all options open. So it doesn't preclude any new decisions you want to ponder on. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada