From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] more robust footnotes
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:51:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9dmvxew.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 871t4q84k7.fsf@saiph.selenimh
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>>
>>> I suggest to avoid calling repeatedly
>>> `org-export-get-footnote-definition'. Also, if the footnote reference is
>>> anonymous, there is no point in calling `org-element-map'. The following
>>> is more efficient:
>>>
>>> (format "\\footnote{%s%s}"
>>> (org-trim (org-export-data def info))
>>> ;; Only insert a label if there exist another reference to def.
>>> (cond
>>> ((not label) "")
>>> ((org-element-map (plist-get info :parse-tree) 'footnote-reference
>>> (lambda (f)
>>> (and (not (eq f footnote-reference))
>>> (equal (org-element-property :label f) label)
>>> (org-latex--label def info t t)))
>>> info t))
>>> (t "")))
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I have pushed the change.
>
> Thank you.
>
> However, the patch you committed doesn't short-circuit on anonymous
> footnotes, per above (the (not label) part). As a consequence, every
> anonymous footnote (as long as there is more than one) gets a label,
> AFAICT.
You are right. I missed that case. I've pushed your suggested fix.
Rasmus
--
Spil noget med Slayer!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-23 20:54 Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
2016-04-25 8:38 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 8:58 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 10:53 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 11:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 13:36 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 13:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 14:04 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 14:07 ` Rasmus
2016-05-22 20:16 ` Rasmus
2016-05-23 21:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 20:59 ` [patch] more robust footnotes (was: Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)]) Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:31 ` [patch] more robust footnotes Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 21:38 ` Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-25 7:16 ` Rasmus
2016-05-25 16:50 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-25 17:51 ` Rasmus [this message]
2016-08-10 21:09 ` Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Kaushal Modi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9dmvxew.fsf@gmx.us \
--to=rasmus@gmx.us \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).