From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: ox.html causes w3c xhtml validation
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 05:15:41 +0000
Message-ID: <87h7yn7e9u.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <871rpt1hod.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87r1xt8es6.fsf@kyleam.com>
 <874kuozocf.fsf@yandex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34010)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1jE4Zv-0008Dq-Al
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:15:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1jE4Zt-0004xH-9M
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:15:46 -0400
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51079)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1jE4Zs-0004e8-W7
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:15:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874kuozocf.fsf@yandex.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Colin,

Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com> writes:

>>>>>> Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

>     > Colin, could you try exporting with the change below and see if
>     > that resolves your validation issues?  It'd also be great if you
>     > could check whether librejs is still happy after that change.
>
> I've now applied the patch to my local org-mode and exported the
> file "index.org". It seems to work because I now get "This document was
> successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Strict!" when validating by uploading
> the html file "index.html" to http://validator.w3.org/.
>
> As to librejs, I don't actually use js on my web-site so apart from the
> js license information in the html header there is no js on the
> page. However, I've opened my "index.html" file with icecat (v52.3.0 32
> bit) and get the following output:

Thanks for reporting back.  Arne sent an equivalent patch (see sibling
thread), verifying that LibreJS worked with it.  I applied that in
661696036 (ox-html: escape & in license magnets, 2020-03-15), so we
should be all set.