From: Timothy <orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-assert-version considered harmful
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:27:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h70wdqfx.fsf@tec.tecosaur.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874jww16w3.fsf@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 590 bytes --]
Hi Ihor,
> Should we use the next planned release version number on main branch as
> a convention?
For what it’s worth, in my own build of Org I set `org-release' to
`MAJOR.(MINOR+1).0', e.g. when the last tag is `9.5.5' I set `org-release' to `9.6.0'.
The `.0' suffix serves to differentiate this from the later `9.6' release, looking
at historical first-minor-version releases (`9.5', `9.4', `9.3', etc.) the patch
version seems to be omitted in each initial minor release.
I think it could make sense to apply this approach to the main branch.
All the best,
Timothy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-25 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-12 18:27 org-assert-version considered harmful Stefan Monnier
2022-09-13 1:52 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-13 2:16 ` Timothy
2022-09-13 2:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-09-13 3:18 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-13 13:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-09-13 14:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-13 16:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-09-14 2:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-14 14:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-09-14 19:13 ` Tim Cross
2022-09-25 2:39 ` Bastien
2022-09-25 3:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 4:27 ` Timothy [this message]
2022-09-25 9:37 ` Bastien
2022-09-25 9:55 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 10:24 ` Bastien
2022-09-25 11:10 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 11:26 ` Bastien
2022-09-25 12:16 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 13:18 ` Bastien
2022-09-26 11:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 12:20 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-25 13:16 ` Bastien
2022-09-26 11:29 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-09-27 21:35 ` Bastien
2022-10-31 14:11 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-10-31 20:16 ` [External] : " Daniel Ortmann
2022-10-31 20:40 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-10-31 23:16 ` Tim Cross
2022-11-01 6:09 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-02 20:42 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-11-03 7:51 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-03 17:30 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-12-02 8:16 ` Tom Gillespie
2022-12-02 6:45 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-04 4:22 ` Tom Gillespie
2022-12-04 4:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-12-04 11:12 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-16 11:08 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-16 12:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-08-16 12:41 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-16 13:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-08-18 9:37 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-18 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-08-18 13:33 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-18 13:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-08-18 14:26 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-18 14:29 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-17 16:43 ` Max Nikulin
2023-08-17 16:59 ` Ihor Radchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h70wdqfx.fsf@tec.tecosaur.net \
--to=orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net \
--cc=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).