From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Random tag-related thoughts Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:54:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87fycbnike.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gn1vT-0001dm-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:54:47 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gn1vR-0001b1-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:54:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gn1vQ-0001al-4b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:54:44 -0500 Received: from [213.36.80.91] (helo=mail.libertysurf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gn1vP-0005nD-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:54:44 -0500 Received: from tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk (83.152.251.81) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.117.3) id 455B2F29001EF2DE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:54:17 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten and list, just a few midnight thoughts on tags. 0) regexp matching Let's say we have :tag0: and :tag1: - then we want C-c \ to match all :tag.: - would that be possible? 1) numeric tagging Imagine we use numeric tags like :000: :001: 002: etc. Sometimes and somehow we want to match tags between :001: and :X: (X being a number between 0 and 999:) - can we achieve this? (Actuallay i stumbled on this while tagging programming tasks with expected version numbers but was stuck because i couldn't look up for tags between two versions.) 2) grouping tags { tag1 tag2 } is for mutually exclusive tags What about [ tag1 tag2 (tag)] for grouping tags - "(tag)" being the tag-name of the group (i.e. matching all tags in this group)? I'll stop here - was just musing around posibilities, not actual need. But thought it might be interesting anyway. Best, -- Bastien