From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Worg: common #+MACRO definitions Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:44:14 +0800 Message-ID: <87fx9yot01.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <1254702207.8436.42.camel@beteigeuze> <477C7CE1-81FA-4754-AF26-01A6A3D1D151@gmail.com> <87my461geh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1254748764.5788.5.camel@beteigeuze> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MunrU-0001CY-HH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:44:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MunrP-000165-Uh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:44:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49197 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MunrP-00015s-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:44:19 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f205.google.com ([209.85.220.205]:61671) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MunrO-0007Rz-Rv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:44:19 -0400 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so2498077fxm.31 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:44:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1254748764.5788.5.camel@beteigeuze> (Sebastian's message of "Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:19:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: sebastian_rose@gmx.de Cc: Orgmode Mailing List , Carsten Dominik Sebastian writes: > Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien: >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >> >> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?) >> >> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those >> >> macros? That way we could use those boxes in all >> >> our files, and they all would look the same, even >> >> if changed. worg/macros.org ??? >> > >> > I would say no problem! Just create it. Bastien, any objections? >> >> Sure, no objection! > > But we would need to exclude it from the export, which I cannot do. Please create the file and I will exclude it from export. -- Bastien