From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:41:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51490 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pet5j-00050r-Sa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:42:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pet5i-0006as-3Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:42:07 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:38447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pet5h-0006aj-VK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:42:06 -0500 Received: by ywj3 with SMTP id 3so2059520ywj.0 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:42:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:56:38 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jason Dunsmore writes: > I updated your first one and added your second one. I also updated mine > to use your idea for the Org mascot. > > So we have three options: > > Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/ > Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/ > Option 3: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric2/ Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain simple and colorful. I also love Eric's expandable table of contents: the one we have for now often clutters the page too much... > I think they're all a major improvement to Worg. So do I -- thanks for this! > How should we move forward with this? Take a vote? Matt's call :) My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg css available as alternative css. Thanks for this! -- Bastien