From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:01:54 -0600 Message-ID: <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34057 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PetOv-0000qW-K4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:01:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PetOu-0003Lx-FR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:01:57 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:51799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PetOu-0003Lq-Ap for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:01:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:41:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Bastien writes: > Jason Dunsmore writes: > >> I updated your first one and added your second one. I also updated mine >> to use your idea for the Org mascot. >> >> So we have three options: >> >> Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/ >> Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/ >> Option 3: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric2/ > > Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain > simple and colorful. I also love Eric's expandable table of contents: > the one we have for now often clutters the page too much... > >> I think they're all a major improvement to Worg. > > So do I -- thanks for this! > >> How should we move forward with this? Take a vote? > > Matt's call :) > > My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's > expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg > css available as alternative css. Sounds good. But first.. I noticed an issue with the expandable TOC on a couple of pages: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-faq.html http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-glossary.html Does it have something to do with the javascript section-folding? By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience. Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer needed? Regards, Jason