From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:42:31 -0600 Message-ID: <87fwsn8oag.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj2jouz7.fsf@fastmail.fm> <877he2fvw0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsqw8u3.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nufa7a.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cagi6h.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50196 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfyWn-0000HN-H5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:42:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfyWm-0002CY-EX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:42:33 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:40287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfyWm-0002CT-B7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:42:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jeff Horn's message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:02:40 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jeff Horn Cc: Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Dan Davison Jeff Horn writes: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison wrote: >> I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is >> great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong >> format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you go to some trouble, it >> conceals a lot of the org syntax). I'm tempted to suggest that htmlized >> output should be the default format for many org tutorials on Worg. > > I respectfully disagree with your assertion. When someone writes a > document "properly", i.e. in a literate fashion, i.e. using org source > blocks, the right syntax is shown at the right time. Please see the > manual as an example. > > Now, I'm no fan of nerfing choices in order to force anyone to do > things "The Right Way (tm)", but it bears mentioning. > > I see no harm in publishing using org-publish-org-to-org with htmlize. > We could even add a link in the footer or header of each page that > links to the htmlized source. I do *not* agree in making it the > "default format" for any page. FYI, Bastien implemented the htmlize version of Worg Tuesday. You can see it on any Worg page by replacing .html with .org.html. Example: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.org.html http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html Maybe we should add some colors to that htmlize output. I agree a link to the Org version on every page would be useful.