From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:49:02 -0600
Message-ID: <87fwih2f0h.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <80obx6vniu.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87vcrdyfhy.fsf@gmail.com> <201110250914.29233.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<80zkgptrm0.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ipnd3zbr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<3709.1319557336@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<m2y5w9jast.fsf@btinternet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36154)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIkBg-0004fQ-KE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:49:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIkBa-0004e7-DX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:49:16 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:35691)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIkBa-0004dy-7A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:49:10 -0400
Received: by pzd13 with SMTP id 13so1956434pzd.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com> writes:

> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
>
>> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
>>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
>>> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
>>> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
>>> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
>>> win.
>>> 
>>
>> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that easily.
>> I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the BDFL, the
>> NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the democratic rules
>> some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's with me?
>

Ha!

Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
problem giving some people more freedom than others.

>
> +1 #+name
>

Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)

Cheers -- Eric

>
> mj
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/