From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Journal versus clock tables: Opposing requirements?
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:07:36 -0500
Message-ID: <87fwhyfspz.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <CAMg28Otfnhz5_mZXmg0B6aZ5vZs04n6tvwWW+ftRSzwtL2ucxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hb2ggoju.fsf@norang.ca>
	<CAMg28Otm6AoMEDeuFj0kMk=7BGhKeGhZiPxG9BjvY9yowcnm=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wrbbfgf4.fsf@norang.ca>
	<CAMg28OuqeYzzPucTARS+5gYn8yw8wt6CzwAvZAO3NvhCRuw6sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39516)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RNp9F-0003KE-5D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:07:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RNp9A-0003nR-Tu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:07:45 -0500
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:54552)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RNp9A-0003nI-RM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:07:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAMg28OuqeYzzPucTARS+5gYn8yw8wt6CzwAvZAO3NvhCRuw6sQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Tommy Kelly's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:06:47 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com> writes:

>> ... it depends on how often you require this weekly report...
>
> Ermm, weekly :-)
>

Yes :) but if it's only for the next 3 weeks it's probably not worth the
coding effort.  If it's weekly for the indefinite future it might be.

-Bernt