From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:09:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87fwcm64x7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87sjgngtzk.fsf@norang.ca> <14128.1333313193@alphaville>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56750)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SEaR3-0004qr-5F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:08:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SEaR0-0003UO-Gm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:08:12 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:52418)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SEaR0-0003Tw-7j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:08:10 -0400
Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1933321wer.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <14128.1333313193@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Sun, 01
	Apr 2012 16:46:33 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> There is (supposed to be) *one* place somewhere that actually defines
> it:
>
>   (defvar foo 1)

... unless foo is dynamically bound into a "caller" sexp.

-- 
 Bastien