From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Feature that org mode needs most Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87fw86ogbf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nomu5st.fsf@dod.no> <87r4rqpx37.fsf@altern.org> <80y5lyoggw.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZb0-0003Ni-QJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:08:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZau-0006VD-Kr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:08:18 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZau-0006V7-Cz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:08:12 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZap-0002yp-7j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:08:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <80y5lyoggw.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:05:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > I'm back from a black hole for some time, and still have 100's of Org posts to > read, so my question can be already answered somewhere... Welcome back! > In the following case: > > ** Some task (A) > :LOGBOOK: > CLOCK: [2012-08-01 Wed 13:34]--[2012-08-01 Wed 15:00] => 1:26 > :END: > > ** Another one (B) > :LOGBOOK: > CLOCK: [2010-08-01 Thu 15:00]--[2010-08-01 Thu 16:45] => 1:45 > :END: > > Do you mean that changing the *beginning timestamp* of task B would change the > *ending timestamp* of task A? Yes. > In the other way as well: changing A's end impacting B's beginning > time? Yes. > Is it based on the clock history file (limited in number of entries), or > generally speaking based on the fact that those 2 timestamps were simply > identical? It is based on `org-clock-history'. HTH, -- Bastien