From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: [GSoC] Org-sync v0.2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:30:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87fw7rnfct.fsf@earlgrey.lan> References: , <87obmgnhel.fsf@earlgrey.lan>, Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0tmx-0001PG-Mp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:30:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0tmu-0005mb-3T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:30:31 -0400 Received: from li424-160.members.linode.com ([50.116.34.160]:55344 helo=dustycloud.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0tmt-0005mS-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:30:28 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Aptel?= Cc: emacs-orgmode Aur=C3=A9lien Aptel writes: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Christopher Allan Webber > wrote: >> This is *very* exciting. I'm definitely interested in using this for >> MediaGoblin if I can. > > Thanks. I've just looked at MediaGoblin but I don't think it fits what > Org-sync was designed for, which is sync with bugtrackers or anything > equivalent i.e. a list of something with an open/closed state with at > least a title and a unique id. Just to be clear: by this I meant I'm the lead developer of MediaGoblin and I meant I wanted to use it to help me keep track of MediaGoblin's bugtracker stuff, not that I wanted to use it for interacting with MediaGoblin the application. :) >> - I'd like to pull down the description and keep the TODO states in >> sync, but I'm not sure I want editing local descriptions to affect >> the description remotely. In fact I'm pretty sure I don't want to = do >> that! I'd just like the initial state then be able to munge it >> however. Is that possible? > > That's possible and should be easy to implement, I'll see. That would be really great! Let me know if you make progress on that.