From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Loris Bennett" Subject: Re: Erroneous "No such file or directory" with babel and remote dir Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:16:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87fw4dlei8.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <87y5kiq71h.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87vcfapgfy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9wd56i6.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <878vbwhczx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9wc1uki.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87vcf0ft1s.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mx0chswg.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87r4pnpehe.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYIEA-0000YZ-B7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:16:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYIE7-00051X-8E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:16:38 -0500 Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.66]:37711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYIE6-000516-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:16:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r4pnpehe.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:22:53 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Loris Bennett writes: >> OK, I must have goofed. What I did after starting the bisection was >> >> - run 'make autoload' >> - open test file in emacs with minimal .emacs >> - test >> - end emacs >> - mark bisection good or bad >> >> I then repeated this for the next commit. > > This would be the correct thing to do, yes. > >> Is something missing here, or did I just incorrectly mark a commit? > > I really don't know, I'm just guessing=E2=80=A6 :-) > > It may be more informative if you traced the invocation of the remote > execution in both a failing and a working version in the debugger and > look for any differences as the arguments are cobbled together. Once > you find where an how these diverge it would be much easier to find the > code that is responsible for it (if it wasn't glaringly obvious from the > trace already). > > > Regards, > Achim. So just as a reminder: Back in the days of release_7.01h, the following used to work: ,------------------------------------------ | #+begin_src sh :dir /loris@othercomputer: | hostname | #+end_src `------------------------------------------ Currently it produces the error: ,--------------------------------------------------- | apply: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, "" `--------------------------------------------------- I have had another go at bisecting this problem and came up with this: ,--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------------- | 9c878a8290c071fbe5e97bc33c300ef2f07d6153 is the first bad commit | commit 9c878a8290c071fbe5e97bc33c300ef2f07d6153 | Author: Dan Davison | Date: Mon Aug 30 09:34:05 2010 -0700 |=20 | babel: Fix temporary file processing in the remote execution case. |=20=20=20=20=20 | * ob.el (org-babel-temp-file): Don't use babel temporary | directory in remote case; use make-temp-file with remote file | name so that temp file is guaranteed not to exist previously | on remote machine. | (org-babel-tramp-localname): New function to return local name | portion of possibly remote file specification |=20=20=20=20=20 | * ob-R.el (org-babel-R-evaluate-external-process): Respond to | changes in `org-babel-temp-file'; pass local file name to | remote R process. | (org-babel-R-evaluate-session) Respond to | changes in `org-babel-temp-file'; pass local file name to | remote R process. |=20 | :040000 040000 b31e072cf6b2951e95b7956d907303e7a04a8cfd 5f794ada52cceb061= 4fe7962a399f7e549759003 M lisp `--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------------- Does that help anyone any further? Cheers, Loris PS: I am amazed there aren't any more peasants like myself with torches and pitchforks beating on the gates of Castle Org about this - remote execution is/was such great feature! --=20 no sig is good sig