From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Minor bug in org export to latex Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 17:22:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvx3cgxw.fsf@pank.eu> References: <51A8B899.5050001@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiRAH-0007Hk-3f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:23:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiRAE-0008Ln-Mc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:22:49 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:32884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiRAE-0008LY-FJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:22:46 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UiRAD-0000uY-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 17:22:45 +0200 Received: from dynamic-adsl-94-34-191-111.clienti.tiscali.it ([94.34.191.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 17:22:45 +0200 Received: from rasmus by dynamic-adsl-94-34-191-111.clienti.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 17:22:45 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org It's not a bug. > I find that a mathmode environment, bounded by $..$, that breaks across > line boundaries, is not typeset correctly. It just happens to work most of the times. Use \(.\) when in doubt. > I am attaching a minimal example org-file. > When I type a lot of text in front of the mathmode so that the mathmode breaks > across a line boundary, I find that it is not typeset properly as here: $(1 > - \nu)$ but $(1 x -\nu)$ would work. -/+ is being picked up because it starts a list. Hope this helps, Rasmus -- ⠠⠵