From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:13:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvw4ucp4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <444ea6cff489e2adc97092bdac881aef@mail.rickster.com> <878v1y574d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874ncm55ma.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4fq3ptf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip11h2zq.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvw5fkpt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <64c8a8451434ab3c4fb5d8e73e9b6848@mail.rickster.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrrPs-00069O-T7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:13:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrrPp-0004H9-0Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:13:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:40388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrrPo-0004Gl-Q9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:13:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m6so2111674wiv.2 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:13:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64c8a8451434ab3c4fb5d8e73e9b6848@mail.rickster.com> (Rick Frankel's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:38:57 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rick Frankel Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rick Frankel writes: > At the time (late 2012) I found Nicolases changes (named results > blocks, attributes and captions on the results block and not the > source, etc) confusing. I still find it odd that you need to evaluate > a source block before you can e.g, add a caption or attributes to the > results (previous behavior was that header arguments on the source > block were used for the results in exporting.) But you couldn't provide different captions (or attributes) to source code and results (or no caption/attribute to one of them only). If you think about it, it's not very odd that captions and attributes apply to the text located just below, instead of some remote or yet to be generated piece of text. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou