From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87fvoh6tis.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> <874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwisrrv8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3dwaw98.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r482wo2k.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ha8yjzeb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh42wju4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874n4yju56.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh4259r2.fsf@gmail.com> <87iotdhait.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8761pd190p.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5giB-0004qk-Pf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:10:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5gi6-0004QV-LY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:10:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:49587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5gi6-0004N4-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:10:06 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ex4so4803688wid.17 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8761pd190p.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:31:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: >> 1) In the long run, maybe Org will be a submodule of Emacs Git repo. >> Completely hypothetical, but that will not be feasible if the Git >> repo contains contrib/. >> >> 2) In a far far galaxy, maybe Org will be stable enough to be >> maintained only in Emacs. So... what then ? Some contrib/ >> directory lost in the space ? > > Both options are undesirable, IMHO. The first does not depend on us, the second one will be desirable when all Org committers will be Emacs committers too, and when the pace of Emacs release will be fast enough to cope with that of Org. Of course, this is only the way I see it. -- Bastien