From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve message when file to include is missing
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:19:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87fvodtyne.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <86wqhpu021.fsf@somewhere.org> <87fvodvdh9.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45599)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W6eo5-00064S-1W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:20:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W6enw-0005ZG-GM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:20:16 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42537)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W6enw-0005ZA-9I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:20:08 -0500
Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W6enu-00078P-BM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:20:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87fvodvdh9.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 24
	Jan 2014 12:14:10 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, Sebastien Vauban <public-sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@plane.gmane.org>



Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> What if `buffer-file-name' returns nil? Sure, the problem won't happen
> during agenda generation, but `org-file-contents' is used elsewhere.
>
> Also, it is better to use:
>
>   (buffer-file-name (buffer-base-buffer))
>
> since the current buffer may be an indirect one.

I reverted the commit -- I let you guys discuss it and provide the
correct one.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien