From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: BUG: in beamer export non-beamer tags exported as part of header Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:32:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87fut79ozi.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87r3cr8xpt.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Izw-0008G6-43 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Izr-0003QV-1F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:15 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:60279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Izq-0003PN-RI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Tue, 24 May 2016 14:27:11 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Rainer M Krug Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Hello, Rainer M Krug writes: > But in my document, I have > > #+SELECT_TAGS: export presentation > > in which case, I would have expected, that the tags defined here are not > exported? It's arguably better. OTOH, it is easier to remove them with a filter (or globally with tags:nil) than to add them back if we automatically delete them. So, I tend to think we shouldn't remove them automatically. WDYT? > But I already have =tags:not-in-toc= but they were in the TOC? I don't understand that question. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou