From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mMeKLsn75F6oVgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:16:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gOdKKsn75F55eAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:16:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C8D9404D9 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk8p8-00060W-Kc for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:16:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk8oa-00060P-S3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:15:28 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:29119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk8oY-0004qX-Uy; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:15:28 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB013240004; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:15:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Bastien Subject: Re: Statistic cookies for headings and list items References: <87zh9mzzgs.fsf@bzg.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Bastien , Michael Brand , Org Mode Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:15:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zh9mzzgs.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:29:23 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftazeycm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.193; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/13 10:51:34 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michael Brand , Org Mode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: UEjtyuoqezGj Hello, Bastien writes: > Here are a few solutions I can imagine: > > 1. when an entry contains both a list (as its direct contents) and > subheadings, only consider subheadings in the stats calculation. > > 2. when an entry contains both a list (as its direct contents) and > subheadings, only consider the list in the calculation. > > 3. if one of the two options above, allow the user to use a custom > property to change the default (e.g. CUSTOM_STATS: list/headings) > and consider the list of the subheadings. > > 4. add a new syntax rule to consider that stats at the beginning of > a headline are always for subheadings, while stats at the end of > a headline are always for the first list in direct contents. > > I'd be in favor of (1) (without (3)) to keep things simple, but > maybe that's a good opportunity to consider (4). I think (3) is > only relevant if we go for (2), which I don't really like. > > What do you think? Isn't COOKIE_DATA property there to disambiguate this situation? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou