From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id KA0ZNDW4DWQ3LAEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:32:05 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id aBfeMzW4DWQfRgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:32:05 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A575DDA26 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:32:05 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=DRW0LBFQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1678620725; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=zuZMQFBoVaQg44CevzCjdW7UelbHLq79GwIy1qsF1E8=; b=U0GEp/N+IdqgYxVakAvLPWJ0kutvGclncycRSf71vGeIlGV3dl98hGg9eXOk4gTKMcrgB7 PteZUeQ9r1tLb+AmBl3HWxxKsDm6a+JtTvRovSu5rLOUylLSvp8i9dLJ8FRvE4MqASHbm9 vuxw6xVqFawu0JgKoVQGpFPuE5LuHRDv3qUdMkebCxUB4Hu9JfbM3RBIn1ZKnjxIzH5M3D /W60iAfewka+ivuZdNNS+jzR9qShva7zrPZT6jYUqhdvL1wVEpX8RZtNuoiHSDIQNvhL2k A1fD1rsBoAicSWa52QFX8p2BIb36Wh5AitGIS7vhQlUH+d12tinFYJunAI4BIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=DRW0LBFQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1678620725; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=L63LPL//HC8GPJs0H+jfUyGTNpG9NkwVobw8dLacnLamGBgsMzzvRIn9cMQLbR1CGWIDZ+ O44iF499jJZoIJyPzX6Gpipa7OcapdUO1QCQjHqP+AjRRWl9Ft2qtn/jJxei5ItSdWyb0V yso3tkrB5wPy4EdKeiVM1LRUY8U2m+Xs0VxvP/aJSfjBz8W9L35Y6+UNWqms6Fejt7iY2T 07qduSI8Syk8lzeZGQRAlZJSAthSm6SRrNy/fDV87kPzbxwu4uJuk2BhopvOQ3u10+yu3i +zm6wOMBurzXErfdsXjlfhJAhQjHcJORApi5qBHA1qx6vc+SKMnDbPK5CV3Y9A== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbJvY-0003Fx-C6; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:31:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbJvW-0003Fb-IG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:31:46 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbJvT-00037t-J2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:31:46 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B108A2400FF for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:31:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1678620701; bh=7Z/mP3lJEM1GYKdxWNXpHwmbDX6++k88Ilhd//bf/hE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=DRW0LBFQIdEMaXmGYH0N33bV6DxzhQs0+FzF5OqLwmLDiBWYhW6qz2sAhsTrn02pn 2nJiVJH4ZuwKFrCEpj7MMWS4dO4yizTVtQrw7kmlD35bVX6ThpjOUUXJihNqhm1CQv pr3YWk0UNWIS+jBsBimpA4dE3DSzQVHkkwSuQv7sFIs4hSO7ixTcdwQPTfTVQ8E/ud V2kNZTfmlk/Pwc1YU+sE8CzipbDFl9bjlVBHkBpSUeg/ubinf4wafsH4X1aMgTh/nY LlDmOz4xncQmeguTjW/gviseJGVCh0wR5R/xOmh6oWeF9rdbh12mhqnMKtzkTVCgqm magsFLZnFQ6Mg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PZHgJ5HZ1z9rxQ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:31:40 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Zelphir Kaltstahl Cc: Bruno Barbier , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Bastien Subject: Re: [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values) In-Reply-To: References: <9eab60bc-9b82-e037-d63b-3d879573ae32@posteo.de> <87v8jceihi.fsf@localhost> <7fc63848-d6d3-80e0-ae78-00967990813d@posteo.de> <64079614.170a0220.5a0d3.0a23@mx.google.com> <97ee254e-72d2-2bdf-e026-78bde076f1f9@posteo.de> <6408e424.5d0a0220.8862a.2a62@mx.google.com> <87v8jaoz3u.fsf@localhost> <21ea836d-8bdf-2d0d-8515-283209f2eb1f@posteo.de> <878rg3y5he.fsf@localhost> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 11:33:05 +0000 Message-ID: <87fsaaurv2.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A575DDA26 X-Spam-Score: -7.51 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.51 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-TUID: pCZk4x3092f3 Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: >> Now, the main question is whether it is safe to use `define' in all the >> scheme implementations. If it is, would you be interested in turning >> your personal fix into a patch for ob-scheme? > > Sure! Would need to familiarize myself with with process of doing that, but why not. See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html > I guess it would be a safer bet to await, whether the patch is what the general > solution should be. Or would a patch be good to have, regardless of whether the > official implementation changes or not, so that others can apply it perhaps, > instead of putting something in their personal init file? I do not expect problems with `define'. Just if you can, try to test with alternative implementations. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at