From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: File modification date
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:32:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87eir63yn3.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87r5v6kfvt.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeGB8-0008SM-30
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:32:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeGB3-0008L2-AN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:32:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60400 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeGB3-0008KX-32
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:32:13 -0400
Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.43]:36324)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1MeGB0-0002Ny-LM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:32:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87r5v6kfvt.fsf@mundaneum.com>
From: Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbg==?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

At Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:12:54 +0200,
S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote:

> I've always found the DATE header to be kind of useless, as it only indic=
ates
> the creation date of the file.

I agree completely and have typically used emacs's time-stamp as well
although I never thought of putting the settings into a hook (I
typically use emacs's own local variables for individual files)!
Thanks for that.