From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: [PATCH][ANN] org-html/org-odt Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 09:31:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87ei4iwnrt.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <811v21sjy9.fsf@gmail.com> <81mxj88e8u.fsf@gmail.com> <87iptuwpkn.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGWk7-0001aH-Bu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 09:31:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGWk6-0003L1-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 09:31:23 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGWk6-0003Kp-Cb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 09:31:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87iptuwpkn.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Sun, 01 May 2011 08:52:24 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: Carsten Dominik , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Matt Lundin writes: > Hi Jambunathan, > > Jambunathan K writes: > > [...] >> >> I am not sure if (and when) my changes would get formally integrated. >> >> I can commit non-trivial effort cycles for bug fixing & integration for >> maybe next 3 weeks. Further down the road, as a maintainer of >> org-odt.el, I am willing to entertain bug and feature requests. However >> it is quite possible that I might turn quirky and less-responsive. > > Thanks again for all the work you've done on this exporter! Both the odt > and html output look very good. I plan to throw some more complex > documents at the backends soon. [...] I'm finding that the odt exporter leaves a lot of xml buffers open, even after the tmp files they point to are gone. Would there be a way to clean up these buffers? Best, Matt