From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Thesaurus terms as org tags -- feature request
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:45:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87ei1nup9b.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAPDE7Wz5DTwhdHVpwrP2kMNCVCShr7D2g0RYO9vagDydxaE7rg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50733)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QixUw-0008Vt-I9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:45:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QixUv-0002WJ-He
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:45:14 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:49735)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QixUv-0002WC-4z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:45:13 -0400
Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so6051940fxd.39
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDE7Wz5DTwhdHVpwrP2kMNCVCShr7D2g0RYO9vagDydxaE7rg@mail.gmail.com>
	(John Tait's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:54:31 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Tait <johngtait@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi John,

thanks for your input.

What I'm thinking about is this simple idea:

#+TAGGROUP: :colour: :red:green:

in such a way that:

1. searches for :red: will continue to display entries with :red:
2. searches for :colour: will display entries with :red: and/or :green:

Would this be useful already?  

Would this go into the right direction for solving your problem?

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien