From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:53:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehwbdxk2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739djqfkv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwhiwwr0.fsf@gmail.com> <87bos6pp1a.fsf@gmail.com> <8739dhnxjs.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipmcxboo.fsf@gmail.com> <87pqgjipu8.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5v6x3lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwh86533.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZjpT-0003f9-Ao for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:52:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZjpR-0001Tn-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:52:35 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:41990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZjpR-0001Tg-N7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:52:33 -0500 Received: by eekc41 with SMTP id c41so2633616eek.0 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:52:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fwh86533.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:09:36 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Org Mode List , Nicolas Goaziou Eric Schulte writes: > The attached patch entirely removes the #+name and #+results based > hiding. Note that the existing "wrap" argument to the ":results" header > argument will wrap results in a block which allows easy tab-based result > hiding. > > As this is a relatively large change I hesitate to apply it outright, > although I do agree that it leads to simpler more consistent behavior. > If general consensus seems to support the application of this patch then > I will be happy to apply it. Has there been any more feedback on this? Erik, is it safe to apply the patch or shall we wait more? Thanks, -- Bastien