From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe Brauer Subject: change call-process also for GNU emacs? (was: Solved) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehuizhcp.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> References: <87sjizvasf.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87bopnmtll.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <878vkrxxsb.fsf@gnu.org> <3749.1327796037@alphaville> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrWCf-0006si-Tc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:58:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrWCe-0002HV-T3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:58:01 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrWCe-0002HR-MY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:58:00 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrWCd-0004gl-Ci for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:57:59 +0100 Received: from 11.pool85-54-11.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.11.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:57:59 +0100 Received: from oub by 11.pool85-54-11.dynamic.orange.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:57:59 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org >> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:13:57 -0500, Nick Dokos >> wrote: >> > ... and bonus points if you also fix the problems described in Now I am confused, from the link, you provided, I conclude you are talking about GNU Emacs, however I only wanted my changes to work with Xemacs and therefore wrap a (if (featurep 'xemacs) Around my changes. If you want to have the changes I have in mind for call-process also for GNU Emacs, I think the maintainers should have a say. Uwe Brauer