From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 07:43:50 -0500 Message-ID: <87ehq07c6x.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <7321.1338312260@alphaville> <7863.1338313608@alphaville> <8492.1338316991@alphaville> <8836.1338318928@alphaville> <8953.1338319276@alphaville> <9046.1338319562@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sa4jb-0004Rb-RO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 08:44:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sa4jR-0002wu-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 08:44:11 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:36031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sa4jR-0002wR-Hu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 08:44:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9046.1338319562@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 29 May 2012 15:26:02 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Nick Dokos wrote: >> >> > ... >> > >> > I haven't gone to gmane looking for the discussion, but if one of the >> > principals involved remembers the reason, maybe they can enlighten us. >> > >> >> I found the discussion on gmane - check the thread starting at >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/45243 >> > > Having read the discussion, I agree with Nicolas and disagree with Matt > and Bastien :-) Let me chime in here: I agree that the new behavior (i.e., following a link with return) is unworkable with the current definition of org-at-timestamp-p. My concern in the previous thread was to preserved what I viewed as a convenience that dated back to the earliest days of org: i.e., being able to change timestamps quickly with the S-arrow keys. I would still prefer to retain a "wide" definition of timestamps for the S-arrow keys. But if a little traditional usability is lost for the sake of consistency, then we should change org-at-timestamp-p. (And Nicolas has done heroic work in bringing consistency to the definition of various org elements!) Best, Matt