From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: flet / my-filt problem
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:20:46 -0600
Message-ID: <87ehnsggg1.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <87k3xk9ahb.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87vch4j3cj.fsf@gmx.com>
	<87fw8898h0.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87hasoj076.fsf@gmx.com>
	<871ujs5pam.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54504)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SwDcb-00065J-Ml
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:40:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SwDcV-00059B-Nv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:40:29 -0400
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:39040
	helo=mailout-us.mail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SwDcV-00058Q-Gs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:40:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871ujs5pam.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2012
	10:05:05 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com> writes:
>
>> Does the attached patch resolve this bad behavior?
>
> Can't we just get rid of org-flet in this case?
>
> With simply let-defining the temporary function?
>
> (let ((f (lambda(x) (message x))))
>   (funcall f "Hello!"))

This is exactly the tact taken by my previous patch, I'm still not sure
why it didn't work.  Regardless, I've just pushed up a fix which
replaces the named function with an anonymous lambda-expression.  I've
also pushed up a test case which exercises this function.  Everything
now seems to be working.

Best,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte