From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: export_file_name problem with new exporter Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:04:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehiztrkd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <20121207122921.GL4294@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20121207125019.GM4294@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20121207152100.GN4294@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20121207190957.GA10848@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87ip8c7nup.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThegU-0006ca-Gc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThegS-0002S3-U9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:34 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThegS-0002Re-Nb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:32 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Thega-0004Gu-OJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:04:40 +0100 Received: from pd9eb3a9d.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.58.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:04:40 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb3a9d.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:04:40 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Alan Schmitt writes: > OK, there's something I'm missing here. First, the patch is a copy of > the same functions in org-e-latex with about 100 characters modified (by > repeatedly renaming "latex" into "beamer" in several places). I thought > it would qualify for a "TINYCHANGE", but I guess this just proves I'm > not a lawyer ;-) Yes, that is one of the murkier parts of what is or is not counted as a contribution that needs copyright assigned and I don't claim to understand the implications w.r.t. the "20 lines or less" rule (or where that 20 lines come from really, since you can do something substantial in much less than 20 lines or something trivial in many more than 20). However if you want to use that exemption, I guess it would be easier to verify if that patch was made in two parts, one adding a literal copy from org-e-latex (with a commit message that marks it as such) and the second making those repetitive changes, marked as a TINYCHANGE. Just a suggestion. > Second, I was under the impression that commits to contrib did not > participate to the 20 lines limit, as this directory is not included in > emacs. I put "TINYCHANGE" because Nicolas asked me when I did a small > change to org-e-latex. They don't usually, but the new exporter is scheduled to be moved into Org core and at that time the copyright needs to be assigned, which is why Nicolas is already keeping an eye on it. > I have actually signed and sent the papers to the FSF, I'm waiting to > get them back. Nevertheless it may be good to clarify whether the > TINYCHANGE restriction applies to files in contrib. Then I would think that everything should be resolved soon, however the processing of papers can sometimes take a good deal of time. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves