From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Eckl Subject: Re: [New exporter] Key bindings and typographical error Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:38:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehgqbcl8.fsf@sachwertpartner.de> References: <86lib02h3u.fsf@somewhere.org> <874nhm6h75.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <86halmu58a.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3xWx-0001H1-0j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:38:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3xWw-0003Bu-3c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:38:54 -0500 Received: from web22.dogado.de ([93.90.176.110]:41697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3xWv-0003An-Tg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:38:54 -0500 Received: from relinux (mnch-5d87a6a6.pool.mediaWays.net [93.135.166.166]) by web22.dogado.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478F3C0EC64 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:38:51 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86halmu58a.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:42:45 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Eric, > >> >> and I would also like to take this opportunity to suggest a change in >> the interface. >> >> Given that we have moved to a multi-key sequence for selecting exporter >> and then action, could these two aspects not be dealt with in the >> mini-buffer? I find the display of all the options confusing... I >> would rather have the dispatcher prompt, in the mini-buffer, something >> along the lines of: >> >> : Export to: (l) latex, (h) html, (o) ODT, (a) ascii >> >> with the choices obviously depending on the backends initialised. Then, >> depending on the key (e.g. l): >> >> : Export as: (l) file, (b) buffer, (p) PDF, ... +1 > > Are you aware of: > > (setq org-export-dispatch-use-expert-ui t) > > If not, well, you should -- at least from now on! > Thanks, i will give that a try > If yes, then, I guess you mean getting more than just the letters in the echo > area? That would be very fine, especially the first days. OTOH i can imagine this is only "neccesary" for the first steps. Cu Robert