From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) Subject: Re: [ANN] Merge of new export framework on Wednesday Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:09:21 -0700 Message-ID: <87ehfv1qgu.fsf@lapcat.tftorrey.com> References: <20130304015051.GC45961@BigDog.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCRP6-0004W9-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 04:09:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCRP2-0008Rl-BY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 04:09:52 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:47394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCRP2-0008RX-47 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 04:09:48 -0500 Received: from mfilter7-d.gandi.net (mfilter7-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.136]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC1041C0D0 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:09:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter7-d.gandi.net (mfilter7-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guGn+ZR1bJwD for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:09:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from lapcat.tftorrey.com.tftorrey.com (ip70-190-16-163.ph.ph.cox.net [70.190.16.163]) (Authenticated sender: tftorrey@tftorrey.com) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68EE041C0C8 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:09:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20130304015051.GC45961@BigDog.local> (message from Rick Frankel on Sun, 3 Mar 2013 20:50:51 -0500) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rick Frankel writes: > Also, shouldn't :html-style-include-default be > :html-head-include-default? The variable and this property should stay html-style-include-default, or at worst become html-head-include-default-style. The intent of changing things from "html-style..." to "html-head..." was to make it clear that the use is for anything in the head, not merely style. It is still appropriate for variables that actually refer to style to have the word "style" in them. IMHO, Terry -- T.F. Torrey