From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:33:34 +0530 Message-ID: <87ehfh248p.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <8738w7c5fh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppz8upsx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878v5wi163.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc8zyiqj.fsf@gmail.com> <874ngjivfs.fsf@gmail.com> <87obera7e1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871ubntg32.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvzxkjeg.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87obel25ya.fsf@gmail.com> <8738vxzufj.fsf@engster.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDR5-0008NO-7W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:03:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDR3-0004RA-EZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:03:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:55633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDR3-0004R0-4Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:03:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ma3so2654735pbc.39 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8738vxzufj.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:51:28 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org David Engster writes: > Jambunathan K. writes: >> Still you haven't answered my "Fudging the mail reply headers" question >> to my satisfaction. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/message/Mailing-Lists.html > > "A mailing list poster can use MFT to express that responses should be > sent to just the list, and not the poster as well. This will happen if > the poster is already subscribed to the list." (Nicolas, I am sorry. I have added OT to this post) I know that. But that doesn't answer the question why Carsten will appear in the To header of a mail that I reply to a mail I receive from Eric S Fraga. See my question here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-02/msg00525.html If I "wide reply" to your post, I see that the TO header points to the ML. Why it doesn't happen with Eric S Fraga's post? The said behaviour will change based on the phase of moon. I have noticed such fudging of the To headers by Eric for a long time. Unless there is a satisfactory explanataion, I will assume Eric is faking innocence. > -David