From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:11:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehboiyqb.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zoivLtiByMmLx_=bA_9vmo75jWY_sJQdamnD8J-h_hGZmw@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Brand's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:53:43 +0200")
> I am sorry, I wanted to say that I want to do something like
> (note: not current behavior)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> #+NAME: i_am_curious_how_this_works
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> (format "%s" org-babel-current-src-block-location)
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
>
> #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
> : #<marker at 124 in tmp.org>
> #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
>
> #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
> : #<marker at 236 in tmp.org>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> and would like the yet to be defined solution in discussion here to
> make also this possible,
If we do add #+names to call lines, and have them adopt the existing
code block result behavior, then the above will work without
modification.
[...]
>> Currently if you want have separate results for call lines with the same
>> variables you will need to use a dummy variable.
>
> Ok, this answers one of my questions in the other thread and confirms
> my expectation. Does it mean that my patch with the ERT as of
> 2013-06-19 from the other thread is ok for now and can be applied just
> to reflect what is currently supported? Or should I change something
> else in the patch?
>
Yes, I've just applied this patch. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks,
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 17:34 evaluation context in call statements Rick Frankel
2013-06-25 19:21 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-25 19:53 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-25 20:06 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-25 20:07 ` Michael Brand
2013-06-25 20:20 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-25 20:55 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-25 22:41 ` Eric Schulte
2013-06-26 6:29 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-26 14:38 ` Rick Frankel
2013-06-26 15:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-06-26 15:29 ` Rick Frankel
2013-06-26 15:49 ` Eric Schulte
2013-06-26 15:06 ` Eric Schulte
2013-06-27 4:55 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-27 6:22 ` Andreas Leha
2013-06-27 14:27 ` Achim Gratz
2013-06-27 23:12 ` Andreas Leha
2013-06-30 22:24 ` Eric Schulte
2013-07-01 10:23 ` Michael Brand
2013-07-01 13:11 ` Eric Schulte
2013-07-01 13:52 ` Michael Brand
2013-07-01 14:10 ` Eric Schulte
2013-06-26 8:38 ` Michael Brand
2013-06-26 14:54 ` Eric Schulte
2013-06-26 16:53 ` Michael Brand
2013-06-26 17:11 ` Eric Schulte [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehboiyqb.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=michael.ch.brand@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).