From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace some HTML related keywords with OPTIONS items Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:00:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehbnsfuy.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vc58fv2x.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqpfoarm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsEcm-0006sZ-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:00:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsEcl-0005LI-8L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:00:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wqpfoarm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:33:26 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org Mode List Hello, Bastien writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Basically, >> >> #+HTML_INCLUDE_STYLE: nil >> >> becomes >> >> #+OPTIONS: html-style:nil > > Is this the rule for all #+... options ? > > What about #+LaTeX: options ? > > See for example ox-rss.el: should I keep using #+RSS_EXTENSION or use > a new item for #+OPTIONS: ? > > Thanks for the directions! Basically, #+keyword: is for strings, #+OPTIONS: use `read' on the values, so it should be used for every other type. AFAIU, #+rss_extension: expects a string as its value, so there's nothing to change. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou