From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render? Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh93r35b.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHWUz-0000Mh-71 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:09:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHWUt-0007Or-78 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:09:13 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:63462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHWUt-0007Oh-0B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:09:07 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u57so431088wes.37 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 03:09:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 5 Sep 2013 05:34:36 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org Mode Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: > On 3.9.2013, at 17:32, Matt Price wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> certain lines are not rendered by the org exporter, but are instead >> interpreted as instructions, e.g.: >> >> #+AUTHOR: Matt Price >> >> I'm using org2blog/wp, which is only partially converted to the new >> exporter. It works pretty well, but not perfectly. It has the neat >> feature that, when I insert a link to a local image, it will upload >> that image to wordpress and link to the uploaded file. TO keep track >> of the location of those images, it writes lines like this to the org >> file: >> >> #+/home/matt/Matt_headshots/Matt Price/IMG_9367_.jpg >> http://2013.hackinghistory.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/wpid-IMG_9367_2.jpg >> >> Recently I've noticed that these lines are actually being rendered by >> the underlying html exporter before export. > > I don't think this is the right behavior, such lines should not be rendered. > Suvayu is right, with a space after the # they are treated as commendt, but I think > they should also be ignored with the plus. > > Nicolas, what is the reasoning behind rendering them? Because this isn't valid Org syntax, so it is treated as regular text (i.e. a paragraph). Something similar happens for unbalanced blocks: * H #+begin_example * H2 In the example above, "#+begin_example" is treated as a paragraph. In both cases, silently ignoring them could cause more trouble that it would solve. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou