From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Help proofreading ORG-NEWS for Org 8.1 Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh91ysaw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738pi331b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sixhqgtf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIDRn-00013i-HJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 04:00:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIDRj-0002xh-1F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 04:00:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sixhqgtf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2013 08:36:12 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Charles Berry Hello, Bastien writes: > Charles Berry writes: > >> Should the changes in the arguments of org-export-to-file/buffer >> or the move to make the (plist-get info :back-end) return a struct >> count as 'Incompatible changes'? Or at least be highlighted somewhere as old >> code may be (and - in my case - was) broken by them. > > sorry your email came up when I just packaged 8.1. > > Nicolas, is this something that should be part of ORG-NEWS? > If so, we can add it now and it will be part of the next bugfix > release 8.1.1. I forgot about these changes. I've added some notes about it in ORG-NEWS. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou