From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87eh1umeso.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjl6ktu2.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwgimiqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87txaqmhzd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNs9-0001m2-5b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:30:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNs3-0002i3-RQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:30:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87txaqmhzd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:21:42 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Jambunathan K Bastien writes: > What I'm after is a bit different: Is it? > - keep single character markup; > > - simplify `org-emphasis-regexp-components' (getting it of it is the > extreme version of simplifying it); You call it extreme, I label it ambitious. Also, "getting rid of it" really means "no need to change it anymore". I'd rather have a static complex regexp than a simple customizable one for the sake of syntax consistency. Of course, a fixed simple regexp is better (and no regexp at all is even better). > - allow a more liberal multiline markup fontification where the user > does not have to tweak `org-emphasis-regexp-components'. Which is basically "getting rid of it". See above. > Midword markup is not a priority to me, but I understand how it could > be useful, this would certainly be a plus. I agree. This is not a priority, I wasn't clear on this point. > Also, there is no "backward-compatibility squad", only users who care > about what they like. That is what they want us to believe! :) Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou