From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Remaining org-src.el free variable warnings Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 21:57:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87egm4rtgx.fsf@kmlap.domain.org> References: <87y4kc2u6t.fsf@kyleam.com> <871ti4gs4z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57213) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx47g-0007B7-Dy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 21:57:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx47d-0005cI-5h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 21:57:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:34320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx47d-0005cE-1a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 21:57:37 -0400 Received: by qkgx75 with SMTP id x75so77484619qkg.1 for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 18:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2601:6:5480:1e5:9e4e:36ff:fe3d:ae9c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o32sm4975335qko.49.2015.05.25.18.57.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 May 2015 18:57:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871ti4gs4z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 26 May 2015 01:21:48 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-mode Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Compiling org-src.el since 71641bc3a0882b has given free variable >> warnings. One of these was fixed in e50472d926f92c, but some still >> remain: >> >> In org-src--contents-area: >> org-src.el:303:49:Warning: reference to free variable `beg' >> org-src.el:303:53:Warning: reference to free variable `end' > > I just noticed it, and fixed it. Great. Thank you. >> Also, what case does that branch of cond cover? > > Inline footnote references with a definition, at the moment. Ahhh, thanks. I was trying out a bunch of different elements and couldn't find anything that went down that branch. -- Kyle