From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [Bug] ~Verbatim~ in headlines breaks LaTeX Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87eglpjnxv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87382eg2f4.fsf@posteo.de> <87617a65y5.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87vbfa63ud.fsf@posteo.de> <87wpzqxz9m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twuu5bzv.fsf@posteo.de> <87r3px5ee3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fri6jl7.fsf@posteo.de> <87a8wdongv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ubx224x.fsf@posteo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18VJ-0002Nz-W3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:26:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18VJ-0001fb-0U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:26:53 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:44172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18VI-0001dk-QV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:26:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878ubx224x.fsf@posteo.de> (Titus von der Malsburg's message of "Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:58:54 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Titus von der Malsburg Cc: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Titus von der Malsburg writes: > Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt. The obvious questions is of > course: Wouldn=E2=80=99t it be more consistent to handle all instances of= ~code~ > using protectedtexttt? One option would be indeed to remove \verb altogether. Note that it is also used in inline source blocks.=20 However, I assume \verb put less limitations than \texttt on its contents, so I'd rather keep \verb around. > And if you want to support the use of \verb at all, shouldn=E2=80=99t tha= t be > done via =3Dverbatim=3D not ~code~? I fail to see how it would solve the problem at hand. It would simply move it elsewhere. My question is how to handle \verb at the LaTeX level, not at the Org one. >>> These two did not produce the intended results (sub and super script >>> don=E2=80=99t work) but the LaTeX is not malformed: >>> >>> test^~test~ >>> test_~test~ > > This really seems to be an independent issue (because test^*test* > doesn=E2=80=99t work either) Actually, I just realized this is not valid syntax for sub/superscript in Org anyway. It should be test^{~test~} Regards,