From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: DEADLINE: position in entry Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:36:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87eg2ki5tz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <84twbg7n11.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4cPq-0006A3-Af for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:36:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4cPn-0004bz-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:36:26 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:46152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4cPm-0004bH-SY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:36:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Alan L. Tyree's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:42:30 +1100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Alan L Tyree Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Alan L Tyree writes: > On 10/11/16 05:51, Philip Hudson wrote: > Also, if this really is the case, then the manual needs to be > modified. Under 8.1, it says > > " A timestamp can appear anywhere in the headline or body of an Org tree > entry." Section 8.1 is about regular time-stamps, which are not necessarily tied to DEADLINE and SCHEDULED keyword. Therefore, the sentence above is true. > and under 8.3: > > "A timestamp may be preceded by special keywords to facilitate planning:" > > I can't see anywhere that requires the DEADLINE: keyword to be flush > against a heading. This is in 8.3.1, first footnote. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou