From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stardiviner Subject: Re: ob-clojure.el is not compatible with new CIDER API Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:32:04 +0800 Message-ID: <87efftp83f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877elva0qj.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvoww51l.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: numbchild@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhpZS-0001Rp-Hz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:09:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhpZP-0008QU-B7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:09:14 -0400 Received: from [115.226.43.28] (port=50465 helo=dark.localdomain) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhpZO-0008Q6-TE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:09:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <87tvoww51l.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Tim Cross Cc: org-mode Tim Cross writes: > I did this a couple of times in the past, but not long afterwards, CIDER > would again change and the interface would no longer work. > > Personally, I'm not convinced that using CIDER actually provides much > advantage at this time due to how rapidly it is evolving. Org would > likely do better just having an interface based around a simple > interface, such a inf-clojure. > Hi, Tim, I checked "inf-clojure", you're right, ob-clojure should migrate to inf-clojure. it is more stable and more suitable for ob-clojure. Have you tried this before? -- [ stardiviner ] don't need to convince with trends. Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/ IRC(freenode): stardiviner GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3