From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:53:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeuq3zik.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org> <87k14i7r0s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o8tuyelh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftf67jsg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874kvmbicv.fsf@gnu.org> <20200219232349.GB892@smoon.bkoty.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Z9k-0002H6-MQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:53:29 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Vladimir Lomov Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Vladimir, Vladimir Lomov writes: >> I'm tempted to count the number of fingers involved ;) > > C-c C-, s --> Ctrl c , s > < s TAB --> Shift , s TAB > > ??? I added the smiley to make it clear it was a joke. >> Which may not be *that* stupid when considering "fast" typing. >> But eh, I don't want vimers to come and laugh at us. > > How this relate with the topic? Well, it relates to the joke. > Please, don't take decision so light (because > some people just ask on (not very well-known) channel about something that > even NOT documented), take in mind that quick solutions most of time are > troublesome in long living products (programs). I would not spend that much time and energy in discussing these changes if I wasn't taking them seriously. > P.S. I wouldn't mention any "number of fingers" or '"fast" typing' especially > when I know that users may use different than QWERTY/QWERTZ/AZERTY keyboards > and even DVORAK layout. Typing text is one thing, hitting keybindings is another. Some keybindings blend more easily into typing text, others don't. Even if "convenience" is a subjective notion, it is useful to discuss how we can improve our collective (although distributed) experience on these topics. I didn't get that part of your email: (because some people just ask on (not very well-known) channel about something that even NOT documented) If you can explain it, thanks. -- Bastien