From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8FFrEW7InF6VCwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:53:50 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QM9dOHLInF4McwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:53:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C262941D1E for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48012 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQHst-0001XN-V5 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59806 helo=eggs1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQHsQ-0001XB-LJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs1p.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQHsP-0001dB-NK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:22 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:55011) by eggs1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQHsP-0001ak-7p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:21 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10EAF20002; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:53:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Greg Minshall Subject: Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails? References: <991128.1587331097@apollo2.minshall.org> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Minshall , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:53:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <991128.1587331097@apollo2.minshall.org> (Greg Minshall's message of "Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:18:17 -0700") Message-ID: <87eesjta5w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.200; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs1p.gnu.org: Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.200 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.11 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.57147050164373]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.24), country: US(-0.01), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.57)]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[209.51.188.17:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[umich.edu:email]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nicolasgoaziou.fr]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: eT+1ti5+6Qxg Greg Minshall writes: > Nicolas, thanks. i take it this is a change from (recent?) past > behavior? I think this was done between Org 9.1 and 9.2, the final step probably being 99dbca3d4f2fb30f35309a0bf4c324535b7dc9f3 > it was kind of nice the old way, but i suspect i'll get used > to the new way (no names, just noweb-ref) fairly soon. Mixing noweb-ref and names slowed down Noweb expansion very much. We papered over it using that odd variable: `org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion'. IOW, you had to choose between speed and accuracy when expanding Noweb blocks. Now, this is simpler: using NAME keyword is the fast path, with a single block. Using :noweb-ref is the slow path, but you can concatenate multiple blocks.