From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QIGOMutvDWD6BgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:02:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iLVILutvDWDfewAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:02:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2DCB9404C4 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3f2G-0004un-JM for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 08:02:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3f0X-0004s5-QM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 08:00:45 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]:37615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3f0U-0001nN-Tf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 08:00:45 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id h22so10001549qkk.4 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 05:00:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :message-id:date:mime-version; bh=QilHs1Pan4axeA6iZDSb3/s0JcIBNAsHYeMZ4Nw4CFc=; b=teEPnIQAF22SGEYi5+WJVzVVqfLdMO80W3y1mhtAarcpocxaLt/hZcHQPPnLimQaLQ GW/ZV7mgp8mQ7vgss1edVezM9QurpwIxvUSRzJmMT4cr9q4qWyfiXEUylJewL9kJGs9r 3BqXMjZPAidJfAeP0gn/Ru7zBYdO+B+zfEy9+jqmS+lNZk0aPkEISMXH9cIPc5TdHDx+ QNbQw+2oPtNodnnTAlq81Jj19+lXfjtP2v0bkcDV8dzBXCBBnq5XBVEnxNchUqRFntua TZBBerriDFBbi1wB/ynrELg0DQ8kgknNnRisz0RaDYANOqog2pW4X0SKK/F13MWM8w64 z+zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=QilHs1Pan4axeA6iZDSb3/s0JcIBNAsHYeMZ4Nw4CFc=; b=dS+hO9XJzXj+hQ1qX4c8NTjQvNp752J+iplAfLCWNfL7VrnmGPLojTyQqIfwbt4LvX Oha1mt1K9tCK8dompGer2ITMA47VY1F7BlkWPzEn0DzCNcABUAsTPMQjeB893N4DBACe hGwZTa2n5aeei0u8ZNi/sV7//a4PPJ7E1p0eBg9PzUQNKG1wch/ZFGzY8Vzu4H6a0XHi 3O55hUbyGkdeWVtL0p3Yr6edVVQidOlIa07iROUwetIhoxlk2VKF0s76OpOegpc4biWR oP7FJEwsdEypxD2RKXQcz4s2SqNt9Zgr+tEjAqKuEMuwhQp3WuLZ53JzAEwkGRgtcQ2S qLvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZWR7NVh+RkMgfGmsKEygOT0PghNPspiO+/oL1Umb5tZC2e/Pq Wh4GMC7BGdHNCp0flr++s7Emkg8tmRo9QQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziIKxdHOBEf/lw877ZvgGMdQlE31QuoDmnGzvDHJxSrWwuhxSldbHHC0+lGsymWAnL9HTpFA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:983:: with SMTP id 125mr563997qkj.98.1611493240828; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 05:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from gusbrs-laptop ([143.244.45.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z22sm9393333qtq.31.2021.01.24.05.00.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 05:00:40 -0800 (PST) References: <87wnw3oqz1.fsf@posteo.net> <87ft2qlg66.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Gustavo Barros To: Juan Manuel =?utf-8?Q?Mac=C3=ADas?= Subject: Re: [Tip] Export a bibliography to HTML with bibLaTeX and make4ht In-reply-to: <87ft2qlg66.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87eeialcay.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 10:00:37 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; envelope-from=gusbrs.2016@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=teEPnIQA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F2DCB9404C4 X-Spam-Score: -1.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: x7R4/S7vvjsD On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 08:37, Gustavo Barros wrote: > It should handle two limitations of your procedure, which > are: getting the bibliography with the entries actually cited in the > document and citation callouts. The first one is easy to handle in > your > current approach by means of any of the multiple alternatives to > generate a bib file with only the cited entries. The second one, much > harder, as far as I can see. Thinking this through: there is actually a third challenge to the approach, which is ensuring the relation of the citation callouts and the bibliography is correct. For example, if using a numeric or alpha style, how to be sure the labels are the same in the citation and the bibliography. Even in other styles, such as author-year, if disambiguation rules come into play (e.g. (Smith 1987a, Smith 1987b)), how to be sure the same rules are being applied by pandoc/CSL (on the citations) and biblatex (in the bibliography). As far as I can tell, this will hang on sorting, something which biblatex is known to be more capable than other tools, so that I would expect differences (at least potentially). Styles such as verbose or author-title would probably be safe, I guess. Have you given some thought about this? If so, how are you handling the case? Best, Gustavo.