From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] loop over headlines in active region
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:08:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87d3ftiz11.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87obzpl3ec.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1314246334-5053-1-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44396)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stepnem@gmail.com>) id 1QwWwR-0003QB-OP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:13:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stepnem@gmail.com>) id 1QwWwQ-00049Q-WD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:13:43 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:47064)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stepnem@gmail.com>) id 1QwWwQ-00049M-Rl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:13:42 -0400
Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so1928915fxg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 03:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1314246334-5053-1-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's
	message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200
David Maus wrote:

> As for the macro: What stop me to implement a macro for the generic
> operation is that for now the macro would depend on the global
> customization variable. That's not a problem per se but according to
> my readings about macros (mostly in context of Common Lisp, but that
> shouldn't matter) it should be considered bad style.

Could you expand on this a bit? As far as I can tell, you obviously
shouldn't depend on a customisation variable at macro expansion time,
but I don't see how depending on it at run time is any different from a
function doing the same.

--=20
=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n