From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Commented internal links bad in new export
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 08:22:01 +0200
Message-ID: <87d36hesmu.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87d36iqbnl.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58090)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1SQutp-0005SB-Tb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:24:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1SQuto-0007l7-Ao
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:24:53 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:60844)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1SQuto-0007kw-1p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:24:52 -0400
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so3027729wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 05 May 2012 23:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87d36iqbnl.fsf@gmail.com> (Rafael's message of "Sat, 05 May 2012
	21:35:42 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rafael <rvf0068@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Rafael <rvf0068@gmail.com> writes:

> The manual says, in section 4.2 Internal links:
>
>     Targets may be located anywhere; sometimes it is convenient to put
>     them into a comment line.  For example
>
>         # <<My Target>>
>
> But if I use such commented targets, then the new exporter does not see
> them, neither the one to LaTeX nor the HTML one. Thought you might want
> to know.

Yes, this syntax is deprecated in the new exporter. Though, it
introduces:

#+TARGET: something

Actually, the target system have changed a bit. For example, you may try
to export the following:

1. item 1
2. <<itm>> item 2

The item [[itm]] makes it clear...


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou