From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: **: Re: [dev] About a beamer back-end Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87d34n3tjb.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87ehpg8vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipep83ds.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ehpbphcz.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3z32eug.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wr30ohn1.fsf@gmail.com> <807gv01zwh.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obocodo7.fsf@gmail.com> <80vcik8izx.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjHy6-0007EH-MY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:41:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjHy5-0000nv-8o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:41:14 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjHy5-0000nn-1z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:41:13 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjHy0-00025S-3z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:41:08 +0200 Received: from vpn-2214.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.214]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:41:08 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2214.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:41:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, [...] >>> I'm wondering, though, how you support the special case of "beamer frame >>> level" set to 0, where we need to add the tag "B_frame" (in fact, the >>> property) to show where the frame really begins. thanks for that tip! This, I didn't know, but I'll use as standard now. I never understood why there is actually the need for the beamer_frame_level, as there is the B_frame anyway. The beamer_frame_level becomes annoying frequently, when there are sections with sub-sections and sections without. [...] Regards, Andreas