From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicolas Richard" Subject: Re: Compare a timestamp with existing agenda entries. Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:38:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2wtzgwl.fsf@yahoo.fr> References: <87k3rf3lse.fsf@yahoo.fr> <874ni66468.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyggH-00088l-BM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:38:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyggD-0007UU-Ur for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:38:45 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyggD-0007UG-Nx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:38:41 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyggS-0006mr-DG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:38:56 +0100 Received: from geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.131.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:38:56 +0100 Received: from theonewiththeevillook by geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:38:56 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > That way, each time I open the calendar, days with > scheduled/deadlined/timestamped entries in rdv.org > are highlighted. Thanks for the hint. > This is not perfect because it does not tell the time > of these appointments -- so I just added a new binding > in the Org read date prompt: you can now use `?' to view > the diary entries on the date the cursor here. That looks nice too, I'll try it out. Just a note : the commit message mention the `!' key instead of `?'. -- Nico.