From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Highlighting LaTeX fragments Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:02:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2vz29yr.fsf@pank.iue.private> References: <87vca1towm.fsf@pank.eu> <8738x5s6r1.fsf@gmail.com> <87liaxtjf3.fsf@pank.eu> <87a9rdgjtw.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwv41d8f.fsf@pank.iue.private> <87ehggq7h1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6pqf-0007Gi-Tc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:03:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6pqb-0007bv-8F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:03:09 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6pqb-0007bI-27 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:03:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6pqr-0005Mi-Cj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:03:21 +0100 Received: from dynamic-adsl-94-34-154-48.clienti.tiscali.it ([94.34.154.48]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:03:21 +0100 Received: from rasmus by dynamic-adsl-94-34-154-48.clienti.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:03:21 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>> Would you mind testing the following patch? I don't like it much because >>> it's an all or nothing fontification. I think latex snippets, entities >>> and sub/superscript should be separated. >> >> I have no experienced any problems. I agree that it would be better >> not to be able not to fontitfy rouge entities and super/subscripts. >> >>> Anyway, does it replace the missing functionality? >> >> Yes, it seems so replicate the old behavior so far. > > I have applied a small variant of the patch. You can configure > `org-highlight-latex-and-related' variable to fontify said syntax > separately. Thanks, I'll check it out. -- Got mashed potatoes. Ain't got no T-Bone. No T-Bone